Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 54 of 94 1 2 52 53 54 55 56 93 94
Thread Options
#1312088 - 12/23/09 01:09 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 OldSchoolBanker
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
::fingers crossed::

LOS hotpatch going on the test server this morning...
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
RESPA
#1312099 - 12/23/09 01:29 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 #Just Jay
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
nix that... no hotpatch avaialable... LOS website mentioning Dec 24th, tentatively eek


::revising LO/processor training to complete forms by hand::
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
#1312215 - 12/23/09 02:47 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 #Just Jay
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
gotta love that. We'll be down to the 11th hour and no testing the way it's going.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1312227 - 12/23/09 02:50 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 #Just Jay
AuditorK Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 962
PA
One of our tellers is a notary public. We utilize her services for loan closings that do not require an attorney. Am I correct that these notary fees should be listed in Block 4 - Title Services and Lender's Title Insurance? We charge the borrowers a notary fee and the employee that does the notary work is paid 100% of the fee collected. This is over and above her normal salary.

Do we need to do anything as far as listing her on an Affiliated Business Arrangement disclosure?

Are there any Section 8 issues here?

Return to Top
#1312240 - 12/23/09 02:56 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 David Dickinson
Truffle Royale Offline

10K Club
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,410
Originally Posted By: David Dickinson
Originally Posted By: ComplianceAsst
Does anyone know what block real estate taxes that are due go on the new GFE?

RE Taxes do not show up on the new GFE.
So taxes will only show on the HUD, correct? The only way the borrower will know that money will be required at closing is if 1)they're extremely saavy; 2)someone tells them at time of application or 3)we do a seperate 'real GFE' for them as David and RR have mentioned previously in this thread. Have I got this right?

Return to Top
#1312257 - 12/23/09 03:02 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
yep...I think you got it! Merry Christmas and a very scary New Year this year, right?
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top
#1312307 - 12/23/09 03:45 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 David Dickinson
ComplianceAsst Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Thank you David.
_________________________
Darn the Girl Scouts with their high-pressure sales tactics!

Return to Top
#1312310 - 12/23/09 03:47 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Colleen
ComplianceAsst Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Originally Posted By: Colleen
Compliance Asst

Did you get a response to your question regarding where to put property taxes on the GFE?



Yes Colleen, RE Taxes do not show up on the new GFE.
_________________________
Darn the Girl Scouts with their high-pressure sales tactics!

Return to Top
#1312328 - 12/23/09 03:53 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 MarieR
MarieR Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 614
Originally Posted By: MarieR
I am suffering from RESPA burnout so I apologize if this doesn't flow correctly.

Important Date Section question- I am trying to figure out what dates/numbers to put in this section for a secondary market loan that the rate has not been locked at the time the GFE is issued. I know that I have to put a number of days in line 3 (go to settlement within xx days of rate lock), but would I use the same number in line 4 (you must lock rate xx days before settlement)?

This is my logic- If you have to go to settlement within xx days of the rate lock then wouldn't you have to lock the rate within the same number of days before settlement?

Please set me straight if this is not correct- thanks for your help.

Any thoughts?
_________________________
CRCM

Return to Top
#1312341 - 12/23/09 04:00 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 MarieR
pjs Offline
10K Club
pjs
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,321
oHiO
Originally Posted By: MarieR
Originally Posted By: MarieR
I am suffering from RESPA burnout so I apologize if this doesn't flow correctly.

Important Date Section question- I am trying to figure out what dates/numbers to put in this section for a secondary market loan that the rate has not been locked at the time the GFE is issued. I know that I have to put a number of days in line 3 (go to settlement within xx days of rate lock), but would I use the same number in line 4 (you must lock rate xx days before settlement)?

This is my logic- If you have to go to settlement within xx days of the rate lock then wouldn't you have to lock the rate within the same number of days before settlement?

Please set me straight if this is not correct- thanks for your help.

Any thoughts?


This is what we are doing:

#1. We are putting the next day date and 10:00 AM

2. We are putting the date that will be 10 business days out.

3. We are putting 45 days

4. On loans that are floating it will be 7 days; if the rate was locked we will leave that block blank.


THIS IS FOR OUR FREDDIE MAC LOANS.

Return to Top
#1312370 - 12/23/09 04:19 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 rlcarey
pjs Offline
10K Club
pjs
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,321
oHiO
Originally Posted By: rlcarey
Originally Posted By: nelender
Dan, just saw your question. I guess I would consider the subordination fee a title charge because title work is all about establishing the desired lien position. If we are considering a first mortgage loan, which is most of our business, we would not proceed if there were an intervening lien unless it were subordinated or paid off. Same would be true of an equity loan where we expected to be in second position and there was an existing lien that would put us in third without a subordination.


I agree with Dan, this would be an orgination charge as it is a specific requirement of the lender to ensure the lenders position. It does not fall within the defiition of a title service.


It was hard to convince my people that this fee was an origination charge and not a title charge.
Dan mentions a changed circumstance but even if that came about through the title company - if it's part of the origination charge or should have been we couldn't change Block 1 anyhow.

Return to Top
#1312387 - 12/23/09 04:28 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
Originally Posted By: Truffle Royale
Originally Posted By: David Dickinson
Originally Posted By: ComplianceAsst
Does anyone know what block real estate taxes that are due go on the new GFE?

RE Taxes do not show up on the new GFE.
So taxes will only show on the HUD, correct? The only way the borrower will know that money will be required at closing is if 1)they're extremely saavy; 2)someone tells them at time of application or 3)we do a seperate 'real GFE' for them as David and RR have mentioned previously in this thread. Have I got this right?


Are you suggesting listing the real estate taxes as poc on the HUD still?
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
#1312389 - 12/23/09 04:29 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 pjs
NanciT Offline
New Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
I just submitted these questions to HUD and will let you know i I get a response, but am wondering what other lenders are doing in terms of re-accepting GFEs on a borrower where they previously rejected a GFE. Here are the questions I sent:
* If a lender does not accept a broker GFE, and then, after the GFE expires, receives a second GFE from the broker on the same borrower, may the lender accept the subsequent GFE? In this situation, does HUD have any expectation that the lender will attempt to determine whether the customer expressed an intent to continue on the first GFE within the original 10 business day period? For example:
Jan 4 - Customer application taken by broker
Jan 5 - GFE #1 given to customer by broker
Jan 6 - Lender rejects GFE (for example, because no transfer taxes are estimated)
Jan 21 - Lender receives GFE #2 on same borrower/property (which includes transfer taxes) - can lender accept GFE #2?

* If a broker issues a GFE to a customer who expresses an intent to move forward with the application before the GFE expires, but the broker is unable to find a lender who will accept the GFE, what does the broker need to do to comply with RESPA if it wants to help the customer obtain a loan? Can a broker deny the loan anticipated by the original GFE, and then issue a second GFE to the customer and submit it to a lender?

Return to Top
#1312410 - 12/23/09 04:40 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 #Just Jay
Truffle Royale Offline

10K Club
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,410
Paying the taxes current has always been a requirement of getting the loan. It also shows up as a requirement on the title insurance. I'm thinking that somehow, somewhere, paying the taxes has to be addressed. If it isn't on the HUD as either paid at closing or POC, how do we fill the requirement for the title insurance to be issued?


Return to Top
#1312421 - 12/23/09 04:47 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 NanciT
NanciT Offline
New Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Originally Posted By: NanciT
Is it possible to hold the mortgage broker responsible for fees that are understated on the GFE which then fall outside the 10% tolerance on the HUD-1? If the broker is just plain wrong about the fee, the lender accepts the GFE and there is no subsequent changed circumstances that allow reissuance of the GFE, is the lender left holding the bag? The following FAQ seems to indicate that the lender cannot deduct the "mistake" from the broker's compensation but perhaps someone has a way around this? I appreciate anyone's input!!!
6) Q: If a loan originator pressures a settlement agent to reduce their charges or to ‗cover the difference‘ to bring the costs into compliance with the tolerances, is that considered a violation of RESPA Section 8(a)?
A: If a loan originator (or other settlement service provider) pressures a settlement agent (or other settlement service provider) to reduce their charges or otherwise ‗cover the difference‘ to bring the costs into compliance with the tolerances as a condition of receiving future referrals of business, it may be considered a potential violation of RESPA Section 8(a). Please contact the Office of RESPA and ILS to file a complaint.


I meant to update my earlier post with a response that we did get back from HUD. RR Joker's comment about the referral language turned out to be correct. This is what HUD staff said:
RESPA Section 3500.7(i) states that “If any charges at settlement exceed the charges listed on the GFE by more than the permitted tolerances, the loan originator may cure the tolerance violation by reimbursing to the borrower the amount by which the tolerance was exceeded…” RESPA does not govern lender-broker agreements as long as the agreement does not violate Section 8.
While this Office may revisit this issue in the future, at this time, we do not anticipate that lenders that require brokers to reimburse lenders for tolerance violations will be in violation of Section 8 solely due to requiring reimbursement.
Last edited by NanciT; 12/23/09 04:54 PM.
Return to Top
#1312423 - 12/23/09 04:48 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
ComplianceAsst Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Originally Posted By: Truffle Royale
Paying the taxes current has always been a requirement of getting the loan. It also shows up as a requirement on the title insurance. I'm thinking that somehow, somewhere, paying the taxes has to be addressed. If it isn't on the HUD as either paid at closing or POC, how do we fill the requirement for the title insurance to be issued?



It does go on the HUD, just not the GFE. It's something that needs to be paid, but it's not a "cost/fee" associated with getting the loan. That's how I'm looking at it anyway.
_________________________
Darn the Girl Scouts with their high-pressure sales tactics!

Return to Top
#1312445 - 12/23/09 05:06 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 ComplianceAsst
todd cook Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 56
God's country, NW OK
I am feeling like a dummy, but what are "tax services" as used in block 3?

Return to Top
#1312463 - 12/23/09 05:28 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
Originally Posted By: Truffle Royale
Paying the taxes current has always been a requirement of getting the loan. It also shows up as a requirement on the title insurance. I'm thinking that somehow, somewhere, paying the taxes has to be addressed. If it isn't on the HUD as either paid at closing or POC, how do we fill the requirement for the title insurance to be issued?



We never listed the Taxes as poc until the FDIC got uppity about back in '05. Nothing that I have seen in the rules or appendixes, or even HUD's examples show it being assessed onto the backside of the HUD.

If the taxes came due and have been paid, that will show on the title. If the taxes are not yet due, how will that slow down the titlework?? If taxes are due or outstanding and have yet to be paid, then they would be rolled into the loan and paid out of proceeds, and therefore listed on the front.

I don't think I am understanding your concerns...
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
#1312473 - 12/23/09 05:39 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 #Just Jay
Truffle Royale Offline

10K Club
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,410
I wasn't concerned until whoever brought up the question back a few posts. Now I'm wondering. Let's just stick with taxes that have to be paid at closing. As I understand it, you can't show it on the GFE but you're going to show it on the HUD, right. By saying "rolled into loan and paid out of proceeds" you don't mean finance the money for taxes, do you?

Sorry. Panic is setting in for me. If I could just get my hands on our software to test this I'm sure it would make a lot more sense to me. I always test out as visual.

Return to Top
#1312480 - 12/23/09 05:43 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Truffle Royale
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
Only if they are owing for back taxes, and that is what part of the refi is for, if a refi.

Are you trying to hone in on this time of year specifially?

I guess I am alloking at it from an overall standpoint, but I agree, if not required to be listed on the GFE, and not required to close the loan i.e mid year when they are not due, then no, I do not feel you nee dto list the prior years taxes as poc on the hud.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
#1312502 - 12/23/09 05:56 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 todd cook
ComplianceAsst Offline
New Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 24
Originally Posted By: todd cook
I am feeling like a dummy, but what are "tax services" as used in block 3?


For borrowers with impound accounts the tax service agency's job is to provide the lender with the borrowers property tax bills so that they will be paid on time. For borrowers without impound accounts, the company will often remit any unpaid property taxes on behalf of the homeowner and then bill him or her for the sum, plus penalties and fees.
_________________________
Darn the Girl Scouts with their high-pressure sales tactics!

Return to Top
#1312534 - 12/23/09 06:19 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 nghcompliance
river girl Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,005
I have read all the postings on optical credit life where the premium is not paid up front, but added to the monthly P&I pymt.
Here goes....
I will not list the insurance on the GFE but if I know the borrower wants the insurance before I issue the GFE, I will include the monthly premium in the P&I pymt listed in 2 areas: summary of your loan and escor account information.
We only use HUD-1a so I will list one years premium in line 904 even though we do not require it to be paid up front - it is rolled into the loan amount.
And the fee does not get pulled from line 904 on the HUD1a into the comparison chart.

Is this right?
Last edited by river girl; 12/23/09 06:19 PM.
Return to Top
#1312567 - 12/23/09 06:40 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 shea930
David Dickinson Offline
10K Club
David Dickinson
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,765
Central City, NE
If they are doing the work for the bank, I believe it goes in Block 1, but I understand the confusion from the FAQs you cite. Also, remember you cannot charge for preparing the HUD-1 (or any RESPA or TIL documents).
_________________________
David Dickinson
http://www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top
#1312630 - 12/23/09 07:03 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 David Dickinson
Bville Offline
Diamond Poster
Bville
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,282
Out West
Are we still waiting for more guidance from HUD on how to show Credit Insurance on the Settlement Statement?

I had it in my mind we would put it in the 900 series, but our software (Laser Pro) will only allow services required by the bank in that series. So I'm thinking we'll have to put in the 1300 series.

Return to Top
#1312652 - 12/23/09 07:17 PM Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10 Bville
Iszy_theBug Offline
100 Club
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 115
I have two questions:

1) If a customer brings their own attorney to the closing to review the closing docs...would the attorney's fee be a "Settlement Service"? The attorney was not required by the bank. The customers did it for their own piece of mind.

2) If flood insurance is required...does this estimate go under Block 11-Homeowner's insurance on the GFE?

Thanks!

Return to Top
Page 54 of 94 1 2 52 53 54 55 56 93 94

Moderator:  QCL