Thread Options
|
#1314794 - 12/29/09 08:49 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
RR Joker
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
On a different issue, the most recent FAQ's, page 25, GFE Block 5 #1 indicates "Loan originators MUST provide an estimate of the charge for an Owner's title insurance policy....." Is this only in the case if we require it? We are a small bank and typically don't even address this option; thus we won't be having it as a closing cost on the HUD either. If we have to disclose it on the GFE, our 10% tolerance items would be out of wack right away. Unfortunately, on a purchase, you have to include it no matter what. It will likely pad your tolerance if it's not purchased, however. So on the comparison page on the HUD, since the seller will be selecting paying for the OTI (generally) would that figure move from the 10% tolerance section to the no tolerance section, since it is out of our control?
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314827 - 12/29/09 09:12 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
I don't think so Jay. Regardless of who pays, it still goes in the comparison. But, if they were to choose someone not on your list..then I'd think it would no longer be a tolerance concern.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314840 - 12/29/09 09:17 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
RR Joker
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
There will be no list, because in the 6 times in the course of the year the borrower would have to pay for it, we will select the provider for them.
if it is left in the comparison, it will throw the tolerances totally out of whack, granted into our favor, but meaningless.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314862 - 12/29/09 09:26 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
I don't get your logic, since it has to be quoted regardless of who pays it. That was the one "non-negotiable" piece of GFE madness.
We don't even REQUIRE it, but still have to quote it.
Last edited by RR joker; 12/29/09 09:27 PM.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314874 - 12/29/09 09:32 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
RR Joker
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
Lemme ask this way, we don't have anything that we allow the customer to shop for, but if we did and it was a 10%er, and they choose a provider not on our provider list, would you still keep that item in the 10% tolerance section, or move it to the no tolerance limit section?
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314880 - 12/29/09 09:36 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,813
Giant side of TX
|
There will be no list, because in the 6 times in the course of the year the borrower would have to pay for it, we will select the provider for them.
if it is left in the comparison, it will throw the tolerances totally out of whack, granted into our favor, but meaningless. As Joker said . . . Whether it is required or not, it must be quoted. Here is the direct quote from the GFE Instructions " Block 4, “ Title services and lender's title insurance. ”—In this block, the loan originator must state the estimated total charge for third party settlement service providers for all closing services, regardless of whether the providers are selected or paid for by the borrower, seller, or loan originator. The loan originator must also include any lender's title insurance premiums, when required, regardless of whether the provider is selected or paid for by the borrower, seller, or loan originator. All fees for title searches, examinations, and endorsements, for example, would be included in this total. The charge shown in this block is subject to an overall 10 percent tolerance as described above. Block 5, “ Owner's title insurance. ”—In this block, for all purchase transactions the loan originator must provide an estimate of the charge for the owner's title insurance and related endorsements, regardless of whether the providers are selected or paid for by the borrower, seller, or loan originator. For non-purchase transactions, the loan originator may enter “NA” or “Not Applicable” in this Block. The charge shown in this block is subject to an overall 10 percent tolerance as described above.
_________________________
My opinions are just that, and might be worth what you paid for them.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314883 - 12/29/09 09:39 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
ktac MITCH
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
I am past the quoting and GFE period... I am trying to undertsand how to best show this on the third page of the HUD at settlement.
According to the third page of the GFE OTI has no tolerance limits if it is purcahsed from a company we do not identify, which is generally how it will happen.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314890 - 12/29/09 09:43 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,132
Somewhere in the middle
|
Lemme ask this way, we don't have anything that we allow the customer to shop for, but if we did and it was a 10%er, and they choose a provider not on our provider list, would you still keep that item in the 10% tolerance section, or move it to the no tolerance limit section? If you don't allow them to shop, how can they choose someone not on a list that you don't provide them. Since if you don't allow someone to shop, you don't have to provide a list. But my thought would be if you gave them a list and they choose someone not on the list, thus you allowed them to shop, then it would move to a non tolerence item. JMHO
_________________________
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314896 - 12/29/09 09:49 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
DD Regs
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
ACK!! this is getting all mangled up.
OTI, we disclose. No issue there. It is in the 10% bunch.
Seller selects and pays for it. This is all done totally outside of the control of bank (us) and the borrower.
Since it is done outside of the bank and borrowers control, would this itme then move into and become a non tolerance item in the HUD comparison chart when it is said and done?
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314942 - 12/29/09 10:18 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 72
|
JJ, don't let the seller paid part get to you. IMHO, if the OTI comes from someone on your list, 10% tolerance; if it comes from someone not on your list, no tolerance. Doesn't really matter who pays for it (at least that's what HUD says) .
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314964 - 12/29/09 10:34 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Comply Wren
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
No arguements... I am strictly talking placement of this item on page three of the DUH form.
Can I move that to the 'Charges that can change' section since no tolerance limit will apply to it.
If I leave it in the 'charges that in total cannot increase more than 10%' section, it will totally skew my figrues for the block since my LOS system will tally for the overage percentage everything in that section, wether a tolerance applies to a certain item or not.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1314969 - 12/29/09 10:39 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
100 Club
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 213
KS
|
I believe you would have to move it there Jay
_________________________
"Sarchasm" is the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315017 - 12/30/09 01:05 AM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Truffle Royale
|
Gold Star
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 480
|
Per the RESPA definition you do not have an application if you do not have a property identified so, unless I'm missing your point, you can't approve or deny it. It isn't being withdrawn by the borrower either. This is an incomplete application and should be documented as such. We send a letter to the borrower at the beginning of the process stating if a property isn't identified by such and such a date, the file will be closed for incompleteness. In this letter do you give them until the docs. expire (e.g., 120 days) or what date do you normally use? Secondly, is the notice that you are referring to the same as the alternative notice of incompleteness that is permitted under Reg B? I am trying to decide if we need to change our procedures for prequal. apps. when no property is identified or we just do not hear back from the individual.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315020 - 12/30/09 01:28 AM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
Comply Wren
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,601
Ohio
|
JJ, don't let the seller paid part get to you. IMHO, if the OTI comes from someone on your list, 10% tolerance; if it comes from someone not on your list, no tolerance. Doesn't really matter who pays for it (at least that's what HUD says) . In our county the seller/realtor chooses the TC. They are not the borrower so would never be given the GFE or provider list. Are you saying that if the seller/realtor chooses someone on a list they never see, the tolerance still applies? I agree with your statement about HUD not caring who pays for it as far as it going on the GFE but they are clear on when the tolerance applies, either lender select or borrower select. We feel that if the seller/realtor selects the TC to do the OTI, then it will never be lender select or borrower select. The only choice is to mark it borrower select, thus won't be counted in the tolerance at closing. It's really not going to matter to us because in our county the seller is required to pay for it so it will always be on the GFE and not listed on the buyers side of the HUD, so the tolerance won't apply anyway. There is only a rare instance, such as a REO sale, where the buyer would ever have to pay for it and in that scenerio the tolerance would apply. As mentioned in another post, we will always be "padding" costs on a purchase by the amount of the OTI. That is one thing we can thank HUD for as I am sure they did not mean to allow us to pad the costs by several hundreds of dollars.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315022 - 12/30/09 01:37 AM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
jlroberts
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
|
... It's really not going to matter to us because in our county the seller is required to pay for it so it will always be on the GFE and not listed on the buyers side of the HUD...
I would review your FAQ's on this one... my understanding is that is still goes in the buyers column of the HUD, and is 'cured' with seller credits in the 200/500 series on the front side.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315039 - 12/30/09 12:50 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
jlroberts
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,321
oHiO
|
This is so much fun! When you think you have it ~ something comes up and you find out you did not have it in your head. Can I ask a question? Are we all thinking the same that the only 2 times Block 1 can be changed is a different loan program or if the interest rate was based on a percentage? So even if a changed circumstance came into being- you could never increase Block 1 unless the loan program changed or the interest rate was based on a percentage. Is this correct? Thanks so much.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315051 - 12/30/09 01:25 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
pjs
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
The loan amount, itself, changing, is also a changed circumstance, but only the fees affected, if based on a percentage, can change.
Boy, that's a chopped us sentence if I ever wrote one!
Last edited by RR joker; 12/30/09 01:26 PM.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315082 - 12/30/09 02:16 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
#Just Jay
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,706
Bloomington, IN
|
JJ, I'm a little late in your conversation for the OTI and just skimmed over the questions, but if you do not choose the provider then you allow the consumer to shop, doesn't matter if the Realtor, or someone else chose the provider for the consumer.
For items that that you allow them to shop for you must provide a list and if they choose a provider from the list you are subject to the 10% tolerance. If they choose someone not on the list the tolerance does not apply, HOWEVER, if you fail to provide a list for providers that you allow them to shop for you are subject to the 10% tolerance regardless who they choose.
Not sure if this addresses your concerns or not.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315186 - 12/30/09 03:32 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
AmyH
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
|
How are you completing the monthly payment line in Summary of your Loan on page 1 if it is a single payment loan with interest due at maturity? It doesn't seem right to include only the accrued interest due at maturity or the principal plus interest due at maturity since it says $XXX/month.
The training I listened to talked about converting bimonthly or semiannual to monthly. Any ideas?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315218 - 12/30/09 03:49 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
AmyH
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
I would think it would have to be zero. Then in the last box..fill in the baloon payment amount due at maturity.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315236 - 12/30/09 03:56 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
RR Joker
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 923
Kansas City
|
This is probably a dumb question, but here goes . . . .
Applications that were submitted this week and used the old GFE, but do not close until after next week . . . . is there a re-disclosure required on the new forms or do you continue through wiht the forms on which you started?
_________________________
Opinions are mine and not necessarily those of my employer
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1315238 - 12/30/09 03:57 PM
Re: RESPA changes 1-1-10
KC Danimal
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
start with old, end with old. But check with your closers to make sure they can still support the old.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|