Thread Options
|
#1478081 - 12/08/10 09:13 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Tesla
|
Gold Star
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 294
The Texas Hill Country
|
So my bank handles secondary market transactions that are risk priced and we'll be sending the exception notice. We also have a portfolio program that is a "one rate fits all" product. The credit report has no impact on the pricing or the terms set - so technically these don't need the RBP notice.
I'm concerned about our ability to produce the old Credit Score Notice and Notice to Home Loan Applicant for the portfolio stuff, and the revised Credit Score Notice (H-3) for secondary market - seems like it's inviting errors. Does anyone see an issue with delivering the H-3 exception notice for all of my mortgage transactions, even those that are not technically risk base priced? At this point I don't even know if my software (Calyx) will support two notices.
_________________________
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1478102 - 12/08/10 09:37 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Queen Mum
|
Gold Star
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 294
The Texas Hill Country
|
Thanks Queen. Yes, we did start seeing one produce from the credit bureau so we do have something, but it's not compliant - yet anyway. It doesn't mirror the model form, has some verbiage missing, etc.
I guess I'm still not sure though if it's o.k. to send the revised Credit Score Notice (the new H-3) on loans where I'm not really risk based pricing or if I need to send the old FACT Act Credit Score Notice and NTHLA just like I have been - which would put me in the position of having to maintain two notices. Are you saying you think the H-3 notice is o.k. even if it's for a mortgage product that we don't risk based price? I hope so... but I'm not confident yet.
I think my question is similar to SkiDoo's, but Im' not sure I want the same outcome. What I really want is to be able to give all of my mortgage applicants the same notice (H-3) for simplicity's sake - but I'm not sure that I can.
_________________________
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1479550 - 12/13/10 02:51 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Queen Mum
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 75
|
Ok, I have read through the threads and am still a little confused. We use credit score initially on whether the loan will be made. We then use a rate sheet to determine the rate. It is not a formal tier decision, but each category of loan has a base rate and LO can go up or down a tiny bit based on relatioship with bank, cash flow, etc. The rate decision is not based upon credit score. Would this still be risk based pricing? As always, thank you for your time!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1479579 - 12/13/10 03:32 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
comp123
|
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 84,537
Galveston, TX
|
The rate decision is not based upon credit score.
Unless your policy specifically outlines the qualifications to go up or down and none of those are remotely related to information on the credit report (it doesn't have to even be a score) that is going to be one hard thing to prove................
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1480103 - 12/14/10 01:57 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
rlcarey
|
New Poster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
I have a question about the chart on the H-3 Notice. Under the chart, it appears the bank may complete the "or your credit score ranks higher than X percent of U.S. consumers..." Can someone tell me how or where we would get this information which would be unique for each customer?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1480113 - 12/14/10 02:09 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
CuriousBanker
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,988
FINALLY ABOVE the gnat line
|
Our notices are being produced by our Credit Bureau at the time we order the credit report.
_________________________
"Once you learn to read, you will be forever free." - Frederick Douglass
My Opinion Only.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1480117 - 12/14/10 02:25 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
waldensouth
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
|
Same as Waldensouth, here.
I don't think you could get that info easily any other way.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice. Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1484356 - 12/22/10 08:48 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
tbryant
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Kansas
|
We have several questions...
1) We know that if the file is denied we don't have to do a Consumer Credit Score Disclosure Notice, but what if the customer withdraws the application in the case of a consumer car loan?
2) We currently give all customers that apply for a residential RE loan a Consumer Credit Score Disclosure with all scores pulled. Do we now just have to do the Exception Notice using only the credit score used?
Thanks! Does anyone have any guidance on these??? I have read through several boards and I have not seen these answered.
_________________________
it's more like a big ball of Wibbly wobbly timey wimey..... Stuff.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1487159 - 12/29/10 09:26 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
JBledsoe
|
New Poster
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
|
We are using the ComplianceOne platform system to generate the proper Risk based princing notice based on score ranges and collateral type. On form H-1 / B-1 in the "How did we us your credit Report?" what is the correct verbiage/language for this field?
If you are also using this platform, I would like to visit about other items, also.
Thank you
_________________________
Details, Details!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1488353 - 01/03/11 03:59 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Queen Mum
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 56
|
Read the thread (no poetry intended). I still don't see a response to the question on whether or not we need to give the notice to poeple who withdraw or who do not take the offer we provide. It looks like we would still have to give the notice...in my reading, but i want to make sure!
I do not see where this was specifically addressed in the threads. If a customer is approved and then withdraws is the notice provided? THANKS
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1509455 - 02/11/11 10:42 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Leona
|
New Poster
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
|
No, you do not.
This is addressed in 12 CFR 222.73(c) - the timing requirements - and in the official commentary in the Federal Register (75 Fed. Reg. 10,2731 (Jan. 15, 2011)), in which the regulators state that:
"A person may grant credit to a consumer, and the consumer may reject the offer before a notice is required to be provided. Thus, some consumers who are granted credit may not receive a notice if they decline that credit before they are given the notice."
Obviously, if the consumer withdraws the credit request prior to a credit decision even being made by a creditor, a notice would not be provided by the lender in that instance either.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1514001 - 02/24/11 03:16 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
carols
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,132
Somewhere in the middle
|
Is anyone contracting with the CRA to provide the notices for their mortgages?
How do you document compliance for your files?
_________________________
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1514009 - 02/24/11 03:21 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
DD Regs
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,250
OK
|
We do. The credit report prints another copy that stays with the credit report, while the CRA mails the applicant(s) their copy. The CRA is supposed to send us a master list to show who got mailed a copy as our documentation.
_________________________
I'm fixin' to fix that.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#1514060 - 02/24/11 03:54 PM
Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
raitchjay
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,132
Somewhere in the middle
|
Thanks RJAY.
Haven't got that far in the discussion with the CRA.
_________________________
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|