I guess my question is what additional fees? What fees associated with a ROV are you considering? Since they retain the right to request a ROV, would not additional fees represent a possible chilling effect?
Borrowers can point out, for example, factual or other errors or omissions, inadequate comparable properties, or provide evidence that the appraisal was influenced by prohibited bias.
This is more than the borrower just not liking the value. If there are factual errors, you go back to the original appraiser and request reconsideration. If the appraiser made mistakes, there should be no additional charges to reassess, as the original appraisal was deficient. This should be built into your engagement letters.
This process does not involve just calling another appraiser up and getting a second appraisal. In order to get a second appraisal, you would have to deem the first appraisal unacceptable to the bank. If you deem it unacceptable, do you plan on charging the borrower for the first appraisal? Sounds like a UDAAP to me.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer:
PPDocs.com