You are missing the points, once again, he controls his demeaner on stage at public events. Not putting your hand over your heart as called for by our Flag Code is telling and stupid for a politician. Is Obama stupid? I don’t think so. Is he making some sort of protest statement against America – no doubt and that type of behavior for a POTUS candidate is unforgivable, especially when it’s not a mistake and there is no apology.

Straw – please don’t be so dense, it’s troubling to all of us.

Well you go right on being dense, as your behavior troubles no one.

The code also says "standing at attention facing the flag," - so, if we assume that the three people looking off to the right are facing a flag, then what's Bill Richardson looking at? Why hasn't he been lambasted for not following the code?

And that she's been a Senator more than twice as long. It's not just one or the other.



Some get involved with them, some don't.



Because the people of that state voted for her. It's the basis of our system of government.

You're just bitter because I pointed out what nonsense it was to say that Laura Bush had the same qualifications. You may not want to admit that Hillary Clinton has been a Senator, but your refusal to acknowledge reality does not change reality.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This quote from Yossarian absolutely, hands down, beyond the shadow of any doubt, takes the cake. No further nominations please, the trophy for most ironic post of the millenium goes to Yossarian.

You're getting close, straw - it's brilliant, not dense, but you are on the money about me troubling no one – it’s you, we worry about you – but, Obama is on the way to save you. You need 'Change,' straw, no not spare change like on weekends, real Change.

Oh, he's also a Clymer.

That's worth repeating and a Second! Motion carried, unanimously.

Typical lack of substance on your part.

Nice try, Slick Willy. But I knew that would get a rise out of you

"a rise"??????

That's a "rise? That word does not mean what you think it means.

If you say so, but you still win the trophy my friend.

That's right X. Don't let the fact that I disagreed with every Obama position in the other post get in the way of labeling me an Obama supporter.

We know how those pesky things called facts get in the way of your opinions.

You have no trophy to award.

You do deserve a trophy, though, for screwing up the size of this thread.

who messed up this thread with the long horizontal post?

whoever did should clean it up!

Isn't that one of the jobs of a mod?

My point was, that Hillary's main qualification is that she was married to Bill. I'd be willing to bet that even her law career was boosted by Bill's rise in politics, check the timeline. And no she wasn't involved in policy issues while Bill was in the White House, give me a break. Some would argue that Laura Bush has had more success in pushing her education agenda than Hillary ever had with her universal health care platform.

Yes it's ridiculous to say Laura Bush is qualified to be President, but only slightly more ridiculous than Hillary.

Do we really want another legacy President? One with even fewer qualifications.

I can't Pale. It is past the time for me to be able to edit it, or otherwise I'd go back into those posts and change it.

Well, that's an interesting comment. You might want to look into the background of the Clinton Health Care Taskforce of 1993 as well as the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and her connections to both of those. Do you even admit that she has been a senator for the last 7+ years, or are you in denial about that too?

I'm pretty sure I mentioned healthcare being her thing several times. Do you think that when Bill sat down with the Joint Chiefs, Hillary was at his side????

I'm not in denial, I'm disgusted at the pathetic choices that we will have to choose from to lead our country.

So if instead of saying she "wasn't involved in policy issues" you meant to say she wasn't involved in ALL policy issues, that would be true.

And you can be as disgusted as you want, I was just commenting on the facts in your attempted comparison with Laura Bush.

I'm not trying to argue with you. Yes, she was reportedly involved in some capacity with healthcare while her husband was in office, no more involved than Laura Bush was with education. She repeatedly touts her experience IN THE WHITE HOUSE, which I say is very limited, in fact no more so than most first ladies.