Skip to content

Angry & Confused Over Reg E

Question: 
I do not mean to sound like such a dummy, but I am so confused about Reg E compliance. I understand that we are required to investigate all card transaction disputes, but does Reg E require us to give a provisional credit on all claims? I am particularly disturbed that the bank, due to the provisional credit requirement of Reg E, ends up writing off claims for which we cannot recoup any losses. Since customer initiated transactions are not considered to be "unauthorized" by the processor and we cannot enter a valid dispute, we will always have to absorb the loss to comply with Reg E. It does not seem fair.
Answer: 

The best way to view this is as a cost of doing business. Reg E protects the consumer. Your contract with your merchant does not provide the same protection to you as Reg E does to the consumer. The gap between these two is your expense. I'm sure you still make money on your customer's card transactions.

First published on BankersOnline.com 4/07/08

First published on 04/07/2008

Filed under: 
Filed under compliance as: 
Filed under technology as: 

Search Topics