Answer:
by Randy Carey:
Yes, that would be an EFT covered error for an improper amount and subject to Regulation E. If this was just a one-off employee error, I do not see why UDAAP would be a consideration.
Answer:
by John Burnett:
If the loan payment was not initiated under a telephone bill-payment or similar written plan — in other words, it was initiated as a "one-off" transfer authorized by phone — it could qualify for exclusion from Regulation E coverage under § 1005.3(c)(6).
But regardless of whether Reg E covers the transaction, it would be a bank error, and the bank needs to correct it.