Answer:
The "value" in keeping the wife as a guarantor is that you are inviting a lawsuit. It sounds as though her signature may have been illegally required in the first place. If so, now is definitely the time to drop it. Creditors may not require the signature of a spouse to guarantee a loan simply because she is there. All signatures must be justified based on ownership of the business and/or of the property used to secure the loan. Ideally, signatures should be on security instruments rather than guarantees.
First published on BankersOnline.com 04/21/03