Top Story Lending Related

The FDIC has issued its June 2024 list of banks examined for CRA Compliance, which includes 61 financial institutions whose CRA evaluation ratings were assigned in March 2024. Fifty-three of those evaluations were rated Satisfactory. Four banks' evaluations were rated Outstanding:

• Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank, The, Hyannis, Massachusetts
• Medallion Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah
• Stock Exchange Bank, The, Woodward, Oklahoma
• Tustin Community Bank, Tustin, California

Four of the banks' evaluations were rated Needs to Improve:

• Century Bank of Kentucky, Inc., Lawrenceburg, Kentucky
• First Bank of Ohio, Tiffin, Ohio
• Milestone Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah
• United Savings Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The OCC has released 19 CRA evaluations that became public in May for national banks and federal savings associations. Eleven of those institutions received rating of Satisfactory. Eight institutions received ratings of Outstanding:

• PNC Bank, National Association, Wilmington, Delaware
• First National Bank, Cloverdale, Indiana
• United Fidelity Bank, F.S.B., Evansville, Indiana
• Industrial Commercial Bank of China (USA), National Association, New York, New York
• Keybank National Association, Cleveland, Ohio
• Texas National Bank, Mercedes, Texas
• Community National Bank, Derby, Vermont
• Hilltop National Bank, Casper, Wyoming

The Federal Reserve Board's archive of CRA evaluations of state member banks shows that the Reserve Banks made public ten CRA evaluation in May. Eight of those evaluations were rated Satisfactory, and Outstanding ratings were assigned to:

• Bank of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
• First State Bank, Anadarko, Oklahoma

The FDIC has posted its Community Reinvestment Act examination schedules for the third and fourth quarters of 2024.

The CFPB has reported it has sued student loan servicer Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), which does business as American Education Services (AES), for illegally collecting on student loans that have been discharged in bankruptcy and sending false information about consumers to credit reporting companies. The CFPB’s lawsuit asks the court to order PHEAA to stop its illegal conduct, provide redress to borrowers it has harmed, and pay a civil penalty.

PHEAA is a student loan servicer with its principal office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. It is a public corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. As of December 2023, PHEAA serviced a portfolio of student loans worth roughly $17.8 billion.

The United States Bankruptcy Code provides consumers a financial fresh start by discharging debts and prohibiting creditors from collecting on discharged debts. Many student loans, both federal and private, can be discharged in bankruptcy only if a borrower initiates a separate proceeding and meets a more stringent legal standard than is applied to other debts. However, certain private student loans are discharged in normal bankruptcy proceedings like other unsecured consumer debt. These “non-qualified” private student loans include money borrowed to pay for tuition at schools that do not qualify for federal Title IV funding, such as unaccredited trade or K-12 schools, loans for medical and dental residency, loans to students attending school less than half-time, or loans where the loan amount was higher than the cost of attendance (which can occur when a loan is disbursed directly to a consumer).

AES services a range of private student loans, including those that have strict discharge requirements in bankruptcy and non-qualified loans that are routinely discharged. Nevertheless, when a consumer with private student loans serviced by AES receives a bankruptcy discharge, the company’s practice is to treat all of that consumer’s education-related loans as not discharged, unless it receives an explicit court order or other express direction from the loan owner.

In March 2023, the CFPB issued a bulletin warning the industry about this issue, detailing how supervisory examinations had found some student loan servicers illegally returning loans to collections after bankruptcy courts had discharged the loans.

The CFPB's complaint alleges that, between 2017 and 2021, AES collected or attempted to collect on approximately 7,934 private student loans after a bankruptcy proceeding. Although discovery in litigation will reveal the total scope of PHEAA’s unlawful collection activity, the Bureau says at least 177 were loans eligible for discharge in bankruptcy. Borrowers were thus subjected to illegal collections on loans they did not owe. AES also furnishes inaccurate information to credit reporting companies regarding borrowers’ outstanding debt, which causes financial harm to consumers and may make it harder to qualify for other credit in the future.

This is the CFPB’s second public enforcement action against PHEAA this year. On May 6 the CFPB filed a complaint and proposed stipulated judgment, which, if approved by the court, would require PHEAA and the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts to pay more than $5 million for student loan servicing failures, including failing to provide accurate information to borrowers and incorrectly denying forbearance requests.

The Federal Reserve Board, FDIC, and OCC on Friday jointly issued state loan-to-deposit ratios that are used to evaluate compliance with the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act. Each respective host state loan-to-deposit ratio shows the ratio of total loans in a state to total deposits in the state for all banks that have that state as their home state. These ratios replace those issued in May 2023.

By law, a bank is generally prohibited from establishing or acquiring branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of acquiring additional deposits. This prohibition seeks to ensure that interstate bank branches will not take deposits from a community without the bank also reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of that community.

• Section 109 Host State Loan-to-Deposit Ratios

The FDIC has issued a list of nine enforcement decisions and orders issued in April 2024.

• An order to pay a $13,000 civil money penalty for flood insurance rules violations was issued to CNB Bank, Carlsbad, New Mexico
• Consent orders were issued to —
  • Spring Valley Bank, Wyoming, Ohio
  • Tioga-Franklin Savings Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Commodore Bank, Somerset, Ohio
  • The First Bank and Trust Company of Murphysboro, Murphysboro, Illinois (Corrected order)
• A notice of intention to prohibit and notice of charges for an order of restitution and assessment of a civil money penalty was issued to Derrick Alan Smith, formerly a community banking branch banker at Branch Banking and Trust Company (now known as Truist Bank), Charlotte, North Carolina
• An order of prohibition assessing a $7,000 civil money penalty was issued to Cody Kietzman formerly employed by The Frederick Community Bank, Paxton, Illinois
• An order of prohibition was issued to David P. Ritter formerly employed by Summit Community Bank, Inc., Moorefield, West Virginia
• An order approving the termination of FDIC insurance was issued to Interstate Federal Savings and Loan Association of McGregor, McGregor, Iowa

The OCC has released its schedule of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) evaluations to be conducted in the third (July–September) and fourth (October–December) quarters of 2024.

The FDIC has issued Financial Institution Letters with guidance to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and facilitate recovery in areas of—

• Boyd, Carter, Fayette, Greenup, Henry, Jefferson, Jessamine, Mason, Oldham, Union, and Whitley Counties in Kentucky (FIL-28-2024) affected by severe storms, straight-line winds, tornadoes, landslides, and mudslides on April 2, 2024.
• Adair, Montgomery, Polk, and Story Counties in Iowa (FIL-29-2024) affected by severe storms causing significant property damage May 20–21, 2024.
• Boone, Cabell, Fayette, Kanawha, Lincoln, Marshall, Nicholas, Ohio, Putnam, Wayne, and Wetzel Counties in West Virginia (FIL-30-2024) affected by severe storms, straight-line winds, tornadoes, flooding, landslides, and mudslides caused significant property damage April 2–6, 2024.

The CFPB on Thursday morning announced it is launching a public inquiry into fees that are increasing mortgage closing costs. The CFPB wants to understand why closing costs are increasing, who is benefiting, and how costs for borrowers and lenders could be lowered. According to a CFPB analysis, the closing costs borrowers pay in connection with a mortgage have risen steeply in recent years. From 2021 to 2023, median total loan costs for home mortgages increased by over 36%. The unavoidable fees borrowers must pay at closing can strain household budgets and families’ ability to afford a down payment. The fees may also limit the ability of lenders to offer competitive mortgages because they have to absorb the higher costs or pass them on to borrowers.

The CFPB noted that, in 2022, median closing costs were $6,000, including substantial increases in the cost of credit reports.

The CFPB’s request for information seeks input from the public, including borrowers and lenders, about how mortgage closing costs may be inflated and constraining the mortgage lending market. Specifically, the CFPB asks for information about:

• Which fees are subject to competition: The CFPB is interested in the extent to which consumers or lenders currently apply competitive pressure on third-party closing costs. The CFPB also wants to learn about market barriers that limit competition.
• How fees are set and who profits from them: The CFPB wants to learn about who benefits from required services and whether lenders have oversight or leverage over third-party costs that are passed onto consumers.
• How fees are changing and how they affect consumers: The CFPB wants information about which costs have increased most in recent years and the reasons for such increases, including the rise in cost for credit reports and credit scores. The CFPB is also interested in data on the impact of closing costs on housing affordability, access to homeownership, or home equity.

Publication and comment period update: Published in the Federal Register on 6/6/2024 at 89 FR 48400, with comments due by 8/2/2024.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency yesterday announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) will enhance their Flex Modification policies to allow more borrowers facing longer-term hardships to achieve meaningful payment reductions. The updated Flex Modification policies will promote sustainable homeownership and the safety and soundness of the Enterprises.

Flex Modification is the Enterprises’ loan modification offering that provides a home retention solution for eligible borrowers facing a permanent hardship who can no longer afford to make their regular monthly mortgage payments. ​The enhanced Flex Modification policies lower a borrower’s monthly payment by incrementally applying the steps below to achieve a 20 percent Principal and Interest payment reduction:

• Reducing the borrower’s interest rate (if eligible); 
• ​Extending the mortgage term; and
• Forbearing principal for borrowers with mark-to-market loan-to-value ratios greater than 50 percent.

Borrowers facing financial hardship should contact their servicer to discuss their unique circumstances to determine their eligibility. Servicers may offer borrowers one of several solutions to resolve a delinquency, including the updated Flex Modification, payment deferral, or a repayment plan depending on borrowers’ individual circumstances. The enhanced Flex Modification policies will become effective on December 1, 2024. ​

• ​Fannie Mae's Flex Mod Announcement
• Freddie Mac​'s Flex Mod Announcement