Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit Union
The U.S.
The U.S.
The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals has handed down a decision in a case where the lender allegedly violated the Truth in Lending Act by failing to notify the plaintiffs of their right to rescind.
Supreme Court of the United States
In this case, argued before the Court on November 4, 2014, and decided January 13, 2015, the Court reversed and remanded the decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals of New York affirmed the Appellate Divisions ruling regarding the inability of a bank to place a stop payment on a cashier's check.
Editor's Note (6/17/14): The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of this decision.
This is a case involving the Home Affordable Modification Program ("HAMP"). The action was brought in Massachusetts state court, but removed to federal court by Wells Fargo on the basis of diversity.
On March 21, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the July 31, 2013, opinion of the U.S. District Court for D.C. in the case of NACS, f/k/a National Association of Convenience Stores, et al v.
Does Section 8(b) of RESPA (12 USC 2607(b)) prohibit a real estate settlement services provider from charging an unearned fee? The U.S. Supreme Court settled a division between the U.S.
The U.S.
Veronica Gutierrez and Erin Walker sued Wells Fargo under California state law for engaging in unfair business practices by imposing overdraft fees based on a high-to-low posting order and for engaging in fraudulent business practices by misleadin