How should a bank handle errors in its annual rate change notices on ARMs? If we made an error in calculating our notices and collected more than was allowed by the note are we required by Regulation Z to reimburse the customer for the overcharge, or is it a management decision based on our civil liability to our customers?
Also, if a bank makes an error on the notices and charges less than it should have is this a violation of Regulation Z? While I understand that this type of error would be to the customer's advantage, wouldn't it still be some sort of technical violation because the notice didn't accurately reflect the terms of the legal obligation required by 226.17(c)?
_________________________
Any statements or opinions are mine, not necessarily my employer's.