Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 2 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Thread Options
#1423892 - 08/04/10 01:45 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Ted Dreyer
Tigg Offline
Power Poster
Tigg
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,389
Looking for My Happy Place....
Originally Posted By: Ted Dreyer
The only thing that comes to mind is that you may want to start getting a credit score on all loans just for compliance purposes.


But how are examiners going to look at this? Will it cause fair lending issues?
_________________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? ~ Dr. R Schuller

My opinion only.

Return to Top
#1424376 - 08/04/10 08:42 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Game On
Way Out West Offline
100 Club
Way Out West
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 246
San Francisco
On real estate secured loans, the exception notice would go to all customers (approved and denied) who today get the NTHLA. If you use the exception notice, it doesn't matter what your risk based pricing policies for a particular product are or who did or didn't get less favorable material terms. That's the beauty of the exception.

For indirect auto lending, the reqs address at 222.73(c)(2). Basically, it is OK if you contract with the dealer to provide the disclosure -- either a risk-based pricing notice or an exception notice -- based on the credit info the dealer obtains provided that you have reasonable procedures in place to verify a disclosure was provided. And since the requirement is that the disclosure be provided prior to consummation, I don't see any other way other way to do it other than to have the dealer do it.

Regarding the dealer differential, clearly those customers will get materially less favorable terms, but it may not be due to the customer's credit score. In which case, the customer theoretically wouldn't get a risk based pricing notice. The problem is the differential may be over and above some less favorable pricing the customer would have gotten anyway based on his or her credit score. So it will be very difficult to tell whether the customer should get a risk based pricing notice just based on the note rate. That's why I believe everybody should use the exception notice because it's too hard to tell which customers should get a risk based pricing notice.

Good luck.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and not those of my employer

Return to Top
#1425069 - 08/05/10 10:14 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Game On
Game On Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 566
Marietta, GA

ANYONE OUT THERE MAKING INDIRECT (Dealer)LOANS???

Return to Top
#1425390 - 08/06/10 04:45 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Way Out West
Game On Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 566
Marietta, GA
Thanks to both of you- this is good information.
We are so going to use the alternate credit notice rather than the risk based notice!!

I don't know if many of you do indirect lending but I worry about the consumer getting a notice on time and the loans the dealer closes on Saturday afternoon before we can provide the notice. At least with privacy notices, etc. they are the same for all customers and not personalized.
We really don't do many indirect deals anymore but I just want to cover all my bases.
Again, thanks for great the input.

Return to Top
#1427940 - 08/12/10 01:22 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Game On
lucyc Offline
Diamond Poster
lucyc
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,074
I noticed that bulletins regarding the rule were issued by the Fed and FTC.

Our regulator is the FDIC. This may seem like a dumb question but should we wait for the FDIC bulletin?

Return to Top
#1428027 - 08/12/10 02:29 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) lucyc
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
No. Only the FRB and FTC were authorized by Congress to promulgate Risk-based Pricing regulations, so there will be no FDIC version. You should follow the FRB version, although both the FRB and FTC rules are virtually identical.

Return to Top
#1428043 - 08/12/10 02:38 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Ted Dreyer
lucyc Offline
Diamond Poster
lucyc
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,074
OK, Thanks.

Return to Top
#1428088 - 08/12/10 03:16 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) lucyc
lucyc Offline
Diamond Poster
lucyc
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,074
Another question. Which model form is the alternate notice that can be given to all consumers?
Last edited by lvc; 08/12/10 03:31 PM.
Return to Top
#1428258 - 08/12/10 05:52 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) lucyc
Way Out West Offline
100 Club
Way Out West
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 246
San Francisco
They're called "exception notices" in the reg, not "alternate notices" and they're model forms H-3, H-4, and H-5 depending whether you have an RE-secured loan (H-3), a non-RE secured loan (H-4), or the customer has no credit score available (H-5). They're given to all applicants, but you have to use the right form depending on the situation.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and not those of my employer

Return to Top
#1428274 - 08/12/10 06:10 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Way Out West
lucyc Offline
Diamond Poster
lucyc
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,074
Thanks.

Return to Top
#1432105 - 08/20/10 03:18 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) lucyc
ahkcompliance Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,481
Midwest
I have been briefly taking a look at this rule. We do use teh credit score to set the rate on consumer loans. So we can either provide the risk-based notice or one of the exception notices to ALL applicants to apply? Is this correct?

Return to Top
#1432146 - 08/20/10 03:46 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) ahkcompliance
SouthernComfort Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 705
Southern Illinois, USA
It is my understanding that the credit bureaus may be offering to send (for a fee) exception notices to anyone that we order a credit report for. This seems like the most simple thing to do IF they offer this service. I went to training on this issue and the trainer indicated that he thought this would be the case.

Return to Top
#1432280 - 08/20/10 06:23 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) ahkcompliance
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
akhcompliance: You can provide an exception notice to all such customers or you can provide the risk-based pricing notice to those customers that are supposed to receive them under the rules. You cannot provide the risk-based pricing notice to all customers. One of the advantages of using the exception notices is that you don't have to figure out which customers should get one.

Return to Top
#1433383 - 08/24/10 04:37 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) lucyc
Carolyn31 Offline
100 Club
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 101
Nebraska
We make indirect loans. Our plan is to have the dealers send us a copy of the notice with their packets before we fund the loan.

Return to Top
#1435606 - 08/27/10 05:15 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Game On
rockchalk02 Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 187
If we are going the "Credit Score Disclosure Exception" route, am I correct in my understanding that we will need to have 3 forms (1) H/B-3 for consumer loans secured by residential real property (combines exception notice + FACTA notice to home loan applicant) (2) H/B-4 for consumer loans not secured by real estate and (3) H/B-5 if no credit score is available?

Return to Top
#1435648 - 08/27/10 05:51 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) rockchalk02
sjlee Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 180
Oklahoma
Yes. See Way Out West's post above.
_________________________
CRCM

"Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to Dance in the rain." - Unknown

Return to Top
#1435695 - 08/27/10 06:23 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) sjlee
More Changes?!? Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 98
Heres what I have gathered: Anyone correct me if I am wrong!?

Risk Based Pricing Notice

1) H/B-3: Notice is given to all customers who apply for a loan secured by a one to four family residential property (include Notice to Home Loan Applicant)
2) H/B-4: Notice is given to all customer who apply for a loan not secured by residential property
3) H/B-5: Notice is given to all customers where a credit score is not available.

**If given an adverse action notice, customers DO NOT get a risk based pricing notice**

Timing:
Closed-End Credit: Before consummation of the transaction, but not before the decision to approve application
Open End Credit: Before first transaction is made under plan, no earlier than decision to approve application
For Account Reviews (where creditor makes periodic account reviews for existing consumer credit relationships): At the time of decision to increase APR based on a consumer reports is communicated to consumer or if no notice of APR increase, no later than 5 days after effective date of APR change.

Consumer is entitled to one notice per credit extension/transaction. Even if the consumer has previously received RBPN in connection with a grant, extension, or other provision of credit, another RBPN is required.

Multiple Consumers:
If consumers have the same address, a single notice addressed to both consumers.
If consumers do not have the same address, must provide notice to each consumer.
**If you use a credit report and get scores for 2 people (ex- husband and wife),have to send each their own notice in separate envelopes. One can’t see others score.

Return to Top
#1435741 - 08/27/10 07:06 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) More Changes?!?
sjlee Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 180
Oklahoma
Great summary!
_________________________
CRCM

"Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to Dance in the rain." - Unknown

Return to Top
#1435987 - 08/30/10 12:38 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) sjlee
DD Regs Offline
Power Poster
DD Regs
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,132
Somewhere in the middle
WOuld one of the Gurus (Tedd John, Andy..Etc) care to chime in on lindzy90's summary? It looks right to me, but would appreciate some assurance.

One pt of claraification, lindzy90 wrote:

"1) H/B-3: Notice is given to all customers who apply for a loan secured by a one to four family residential property (include Notice to Home Loan Applicant)"

Doesn't HB-3 get given to the consumer only and not with the Notice to Home Loan Applicants. Not given with the NTHLA?

Thanks
_________________________
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.

Return to Top
#1436055 - 08/30/10 02:43 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) DD Regs
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
DDRegs: The H-3 form includes the Credit Score information as well as the Notice to Home Loan Applicants, so it's intended to kill three birds with one disclosure. See the last sentence in paragraph 4 of Appendix H.

The only other comment that I have is that the rules allow sending an H-1 notice to multiple consumers at the same address, but not the H-3, H-4 or H-5 exception forms. Under 222.75(c)(2) each person must get a separate exception form.

Return to Top
#1436374 - 08/30/10 07:19 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Ted Dreyer
Georgia Plum
Unregistered

I hate to sound like I don't have a clue what's going on, but I DON"T HAVE A CLUE. When is this effective? Embrace the change, embrace the change

Return to Top
#1436384 - 08/30/10 07:36 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11)
Dani York, CRCM Offline
Power Poster
Dani York, CRCM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,663
TN
Jan 1, 2011
_________________________
I can't herd the cats anymore, so I just set up the electric fences and let them fry when they stray out of bounds.

Return to Top
#1437884 - 09/01/10 10:01 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Dani York, CRCM
Compliance Chick Offline
100 Club
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 192
New Orleans, La.
Please check my logic on this ...

The rules require us to provide a risk based pricing notice when we grant, extend, or otherwise provide credit. To me that would include renewals AND change in terms. Is that correct?

And with the exceptions, that would mean we would need to provide either the risk based notice or the credit score disclosure notice for a change in terms?
_________________________
Compliance Chick

Return to Top
#1438063 - 09/02/10 02:24 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Compliance Chick
Compliance Chick Offline
100 Club
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 192
New Orleans, La.
I ahve another question:

Can we choose to use tiered pricing method on one product, use credit score proxy on another product, and use the credit score disclosure option on another product?
_________________________
Compliance Chick

Return to Top
#1438403 - 09/02/10 06:16 PM Re: Risk-based pricing (FACTA 1/1/11) Compliance Chick
ahkcompliance Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,481
Midwest
I want to make sure I understand this corerctly. If we use the exception, we only have to provide the credit score disclosure (model form B-3, B-4, or B-5), and not a risk based pricing notice.

Return to Top
Page 2 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9