Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#159207 - 02/11/04 05:17 PM FACT ACT
Anonymous
Unregistered

I thought I read somewhere that some provisions of the FACT ACT were effective 3/31/04. Does anyone know what those provisions are or am I wrong?

Return to Top
#159208 - 02/11/04 05:29 PM Re: FACT ACT
Cowboys Fan Online
Power Poster
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,623
SC
Some are effective in March, others in December.
Here's a link that may help you.

FACT Act
_________________________

Return to Top
#159209 - 02/11/04 05:29 PM Re: FACT ACT
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
A few provisions are effective then, but the ones that will have the most impact are effective in December. See http://www.bankersonline.com/topstory/fedreg/68FR6526.pdf

Return to Top
#159210 - 02/11/04 08:41 PM Re: FACT ACT
BankerMama Offline
Diamond Poster
BankerMama
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,543
Do you think the opt-out mentioned in Section 213 and 214 is different than the opt-out we already do for affiliate sharing (we don't share with any third party).?

Return to Top
#159211 - 02/11/04 09:03 PM Re: FACT ACT
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
The opt-out for section 213 (to opt-out of credit solicitations based upon prescreened lists) will be the same as far as content, but will have new format and presentation requirements. The 214 affiliate sharing opt-out will apply IF information is used for marketing solicitations, even if it is transaction and experience information that not subject to opt-out today.

Return to Top
#159212 - 02/11/04 09:54 PM Re: FACT ACT
BankerMama Offline
Diamond Poster
BankerMama
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,543
So, if I send out my annual privacy disclosures in May and I give them the right to opt out of sharing transaction and experience information as well as nonpublic personal information with our affiliates..........will I be in compliance with this new requirement? Otherwise, looks like a seperate mass mailing would have to be done.

Return to Top
#159213 - 02/11/04 10:52 PM Re: FACT ACT
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
We'll just have to see how they deal with this issue when the regulations come out.

Return to Top
#159214 - 03/09/04 02:03 PM Re: FACT ACT
drvmecrazy Offline
100 Club
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 232
We wanted to enter into a credit card arrangement with another company, where on our behalf, they send infomation (not prescreened) to our customer base. Will we still be allowed to do this under the FACT Act?
_________________________
These opinions are mine & not necessarily those of my employer. (Remember, you get what you pay for)

Return to Top
#159215 - 03/09/04 03:08 PM Re: FACT ACT
upstateNY Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 933
New York State
Quote:

The 214 affiliate sharing opt-out will apply IF information is used for marketing solicitations, even if it is transaction and experience information that not subject to opt-out today.




I've been trying to get my arms around this before going to our marketing department with the bad news. We have a broker/dealer subsidiary. We currently share transaction information with the sub, for the purpose of them subsequently cross marketing their products to our customers. This does not currently require opt-out under GLBA. We mail our privacy notices in May, which have no opt out provision. Am I to understand that with the new requirements under FACT Act, we will have to give our bank customers the right to opt-out of the sharing of our transaction history with our subsidiary, if the sub is going to use it to market its products to the customer? And if so, would we then have to conduct another privacy notice mailing upon the effective date of this requirement?

Return to Top
#159216 - 03/09/04 03:54 PM Re: FACT ACT
Anonymous
Unregistered

We are in the same boat. I believe as long as the bank markets to the bank's customers solicitations about the sub's products, the customer cannot opt out. 624(a)(4)(A) Scope "the infomation is being used to make a solicitation to a consumer with whom the person has a pre-existing business relationship". And, as long as the sub solicits it's customers about the bank's products, we're good.

The ACB came out with a bulletin that says that the opt out notice can be sent together with other disclosures required by GLB and that the effective date shall be set in the regulation, will allow the opt out to be sent with the financial institutions next GLB notice. If you send your GLB privacy notice this May, then hopefully the regulation will allow for you to provide the opt out in the next year's mailing.

Return to Top
#159217 - 03/09/04 04:23 PM Re: FACT ACT
upstateNY Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 933
New York State
Quote:

And, as long as the sub solicits it's customers about the bank's products, we're good.




Thanks Melissa. But the subsidiary could be marketing to bank customers, who are not yet customers of the sub. Hence, my question. I believe this will require opt-out in the future. Do you agree?

Return to Top