The Bank I work for has a loan to a disengaged business. The 100% owner of the business is also a guarantor on the loan. The rents and expenses of this office building securing this loan, is now included on the owner’s tax return on Schedule E-Supplemental Income and Loss. Considering the guidelines below on reporting income for small business loans should we:
A) Report the income of the building, that is included in the owner’s tax return as supplemental income
B) Report the owner’s entire income for this loan-my intuition says no because he is a guarantor and not considered a subsidiary or affiliate of this business.
C) Report the income as a Code 3-Unknown/NA
Generally, an institution should rely on the revenues that it considered in making its credit decision when indicating whether a small business or small farm borrower had gross annual revenues of $1 million or less. For example, in the case of affiliated businesses, such as a parent corporation and its subsidiary, if the institution considered the revenues of the entity’s parent or a subsidiary corporation of the parent as well, then the institution would aggregate the revenues of both corporations to determine whether the revenues are $1 million or less. Alternatively, if the institution considered the revenues of only the entity to which the loan is actually extended, the institution should rely solely upon whether gross annual revenues are above or below $1 million for that entity.
However, if the institution considered and relied on revenues or income of a cosigner or guarantor that is not an affiliate of the borrower, such as a sole proprietor, it should not adjust the borrower’s revenues for reporting purposes.
The loan officer and staff believe that the owner’s income should be reported for this loan because they now regard the owner as an affiliate of the business. I disagree and would either consider option A or C above as the solution.