Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Thread Options
#1956331 - 08/22/14 08:36 PM Re: HPML, 3.5% and Escrow requirement overregulated
Jerod Moyer Offline
Platinum Poster
Jerod Moyer
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 667
Sioux Falls, SD
HPML status can only apply to a loan secured by a primary residence. And no, the 3.5% is only for QM status if you are a small creditor. In other words if you are a small creditor under the QM rules you can obtain a “Conclusive” Safe Harbor for Small Creditor Portfolio and Balloon Payment QM first lien HPML’s where the Annual Percentage Rate (APR)/Average Prime Offer Rate (APOR) spread is less than 3.5%. The loan secured by a 1st lien primary residence is still an HPML at 1.5%.
_________________________
Jerod Moyer
www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top
Escrows on Higher-Priced Mortgages
#1956633 - 08/25/14 04:50 PM Re: HPML, 3.5% and Escrow requirement Jerod Moyer
KTMiteComply Offline
Power Poster
KTMiteComply
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,298
only if I want to....
So...and I'm just so sorry for being complete dense to this issue again...but what does this stmt below "mean" for small creditors again??? That we don't have to "escrow"...that we don't have to have "assets"...that we don't have to comply with the 43% DTI?? If nothing changes about HPML regardless if you are a small creditor or not...sorry as usual I just don't get it...


However earlier this year, the CFPB announced an amendment to Regulation Z that created a new category of qualified mortgages. Any creditor that…
1.Had total assets less than $2 billion AND
2.Extended less than 500 first-lien mortgages last year[/b]

…can be considered a small creditor. The threshold for small creditors has been increased from 1.5 to 3.5 percentage points. Therefore, using the same assumption of a 4.25% APOR, a small creditor could originate a first-lien mortgage up to 7.75% (APOR + 3.5%) and still avoid the HPML label.
_________________________
Trust in the Lord with ALL your heart...Prov 3:5-6

Return to Top
#1956680 - 08/25/14 06:21 PM Re: HPML, 3.5% and Escrow requirement overregulated
Smee Offline
New Poster
Smee
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18
Midwest
Unless it's a jumbo, if the rate's at APOR + 1.5%, it's an HPML. You must escrow unless you satisfy each part of the four-part test.

I think the author of that ^blue text^ is confusing HPML with Higher-Priced Covered Transaction (HPCT). My shop does things as simply as a small-creditor-QM originator can, so my memory may not be serving me well here, but I think you lose the ATR safe harbor on a HPCT.

Return to Top
#2001417 - 03/13/15 01:24 PM Re: HPML, 3.5% and Escrow requirement overregulated
SnuffytheSeal Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 270
State of Confusion
The escrow requirement applies to first lien loans - I have a second lien where there is no existing escrow requirement on the first.

Since the rule applies only (?) to first lien loans, need I establish an escrow account on the subordinate lien even though no escrow account currently exists?


Last edited by SnuffytheSeal; 03/13/15 01:42 PM.
_________________________
Waiter, there's too much pepper in my paprikash

Return to Top
#2001433 - 03/13/15 01:57 PM Re: HPML, 3.5% and Escrow requirement overregulated
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,886
Bloomington, IN
No. As you stated the escrow requirement only applies to first lien loans.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
Page 2 of 2 1 2