Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2059541 - 01/20/16 06:10 PM ATM dispute
Banker57 Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 439
Minnesota
We chose to close an account due to notification of force closure at another bank. A few days after the account was closed the customer disputed an ATM withdrawal that occurred a few days prior to the account being closed. While we are conducting the dispute request, how should provisional credit be handled? Obviously if the dispute comes back as customer liability there is no way we will be able to take back the provisional credit.

Return to Top
eBanking / Technology
#2059546 - 01/20/16 06:19 PM Re: ATM dispute Banker57
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
The regulation doesn't make allowances for that challenge. You have to provide provisional credit if you can't wrap up your investigation in 10 business days, and, if you have informed the consumer he or she must confirm the claim in writing (assuming it was made orally), that confirmation arrived within the 10-BD period. And you have to make the provisional credit available for the consumer's use. That generally means you'll have to force the account to reopen. Alternatively you could open a new account for the provisional credit. Either way, if you end up taking the credit back (or part of it) and the account goes OD, you are entitled to pursue collection efforts.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2059932 - 01/22/16 02:25 PM Re: ATM dispute Banker57
Banker57 Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 439
Minnesota
Is there any way we can place a hold on the provisional credit? Maybe open a new savings account and place a hold on the funds?

Return to Top
#2059978 - 01/22/16 04:21 PM Re: ATM dispute John Burnett
CULady Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 497
WA
Originally Posted By John Burnett
And you have to make the provisional credit available for the consumer's use.


Nope. John already said it here. My suggestion would be to investigate and make your decision before the provisional credit is due if possible.

Return to Top
#2059994 - 01/22/16 05:01 PM Re: ATM dispute Banker57
Banker57 Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 439
Minnesota
Thank you both for your input. I did not think there was a way around it but thought I would take a stab at it. It is frustrating that action was taken due to account abuse, now we must provide access for additional account abuse.

Return to Top
#2060869 - 01/27/16 09:35 PM Re: ATM dispute Banker57
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Just because you have to provide the provisional credit for the consumer's use, there's nothing requiring that you provide all the access that the consumer has abused to misuse the account in the past. For example, you don't have to pay overdrafts, don't have to issue an ATM or debit card, etc. But if, as you are concerned, the consumer takes the balance down to $0 and you determine that there was no error (the transactions being challenged were authorized, etc.), you will have to take back the provisional credit, overdraw the account, and start whatever collection process you have to try to actually recover the funds.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z