So I just want to run this by everyone and see if I am on the right track:
On 2/17/2021 we gave a customer access to our Overdraft Privilege service. At this time we had them sign a Reg E opt in/out form and they chose to opt in to having overdrafts on ATM & one time POS transactions paid.
On 3/26/2021 we removed Overdraft Privilege due to account issues. At this time, we did not change the opt in option to Reg E on our Core system, however, because they were not currently in the Overdraft program, it would not pay overdrafts on ATM and POS transactions.
On 7/10/2021 we gave the customer access to Overdraft Privilege again. This reactivated the Reg E opt-in option on their account. However, the BM did not get a new Reg E form signed by the customer.
I say that since we removed Overdraft Privilege in March, then that voided the Reg E form that was originally signed in February and we should have had the customer sign a brand new Reg E form in July stating whether they wanted to opt in or out of OD on ATM & POS transactions.
My thinking now is - since we did not get this form, then we should not have been paying OD's on ATM & POS transactions and we really shouldn't have been charging the OD fee. I believe we need to refund these fees to the customer as a way of saying, this was our mistake and we are trying to make it right, in the case an examiner finds it. I have not ran this by my supervisor yet, I just wanted to see if I am on the right track here. The sum needing refunded would be a large amount - $1440.00. This would be any fees charged since 7/10/2021.
I'm thinking we probably should not have given the customer access to ODP again, but that's another issue.
Thanks for any thoughts!!