Skip to content
BOL Conferences

Thread Options
#2301492 - 09/10/24 06:05 PM Reg E question
MPBSA Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 28
We have a customer who had fraud that started back in May of 2024. The customer notified us in August of 2024. The address we have on record where his statements were being mailed was his parents address. The customer stated he has been living away from the address on record for a while prior to the fraud occurring. Our terms and conditions state it is the obligation of the customer to notify the bank of any name or address change and that we will only communicate with the customer through the most recent information you provided the bank.

That being said, how would this impact the banks responsibility to provide provisional credit to the customer. Had we had the most recent address information the customer would have received his statements in a timely manner.

Return to Top
Operations Compliance
#2301500 - 09/10/24 06:44 PM Re: Reg E question MPBSA
Paul Orlowski Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 187
Connecticut, USA
Many people nowadays get their statements online, so changing their address on file doesn't cross their mind. As to how this impacts provisional credit, remember the 60 days is a limit on liability for the FI that addresses the idiot customers. The customer could just as easily receive statements and go back a year or more for the initial fraud claim, but they will never get back more than that 60 days.

Return to Top
#2301502 - 09/10/24 07:00 PM Re: Reg E question MPBSA
JR00K Offline
New Poster
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 22
Regarding the requirement for provisional credit, I would suggest reviewing the CFPB Official Interpretation regarding late notice:

Quote
Effect of late notice. An institution is not required to comply with the requirements of this section for any notice of error from the consumer that is received by the institution later than 60 days from the date on which the periodic statement first reflecting the error is sent. Where the consumer's assertion of error involves an unauthorized EFT, however, the institution must comply with ยง 1005.6 before it may impose any liability on the consumer.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z, John Burnett