Thread Options
|
#469481 - 12/13/05 04:57 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
I think you have found an area where the law "lags" technology. While there are at least record retention requirements regarding sales of official checks, there is no BSA or AML related regulation for banks dealing with the sale of stored value cards, a much more robust and sophisticated way to move money.
If you search the new examination procedures for "stored value" you will find several references. However, there is little or no guidance there, just acknowledgements that this version of "E-cash" can be used to launder money.
Basic suggestions would be along the lines that they only be:
1) sold to existing customers (perhaps those that have banked with your institution for a period of time) and 2) allowed to carry balances reflective of "consumer" activity.
As a part of your new product evaluation it might also be helpful to know if this is intended as a product that would "keep" customers or one that would "attract" customers. If it's the latter, are they customers that would alter your risk profile?
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469482 - 12/13/05 07:39 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
Power Poster
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,029
Sweet Home AL
|
Some of the mitigating factors we noted in our risk assessment include: cards are not reloadable, low cash value (maximum $1,000), significant fees will quickly reduce value if not used promptly, cannot be used at an ATM to obtain cash. I noted an interesting article yesterday regarding prepaid cards @ http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/P137668.asp
_________________________
Life without Jesus is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469485 - 12/16/05 01:10 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
That's a good article, but I am surprised at the reference to fraud detection systems as being relevant to mitigating the money laundering risks. One of the best panels at the ABA's MLES this year dealt with credit cards. In that discussion it was generally acknowledged that the anti-fraud systems used by credit card issuers cannot identify money laundering. The launderer's use of the card to purchase goods and services appears to be normal.
If a would-be terrorist is handed 10 stored value cards issued by 10 different banks with a balance of $1,000 on each shortly after he clears customs, he's in business. Even after the fact, his movements and actions will be far more difficult to track than those of the 9/11 terrorists.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469486 - 12/19/05 07:27 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
New Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
If a would-be terrorist is handed 10 stored value cards issued by 10 different banks with a balance of $1,000 on each shortly after he clears customs, he's in business. Even after the fact, his movements and actions will be far more difficult to track than those of the 9/11 terrorists.
When issuing very large volumes of anonymous stored value cards, the cost of detecting activity such as this would be very high. We are currently exploring many different ways to detect unusual or suspicious activity to try to stay ahead of the regulators, however, if the standard is as above, it will be expensive.
_________________________
Nobody has more fun than people.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469487 - 12/20/05 02:51 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 73
|
I was the originator of this "stored value" card issue and Michele was very nice to post this in the Threads on my behalf. I wanted to thank all who left responses as well as the article. Thank you very much!!!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469488 - 12/22/05 02:42 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
100 Club
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 183
USA
|
Can I ask a follow-up question? I was reading through previous posts and I believe if we sell Gift Checks to non-customers we should do an OFAC check, correct? Should we also check them against the 314a list? Thank you in advance for any guidance you can give.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469490 - 01/15/06 11:43 AM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
There is an excellent, detailed discussion of stored value cards beginning on page 20 (document, not PDF) of the recently published U.S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment. The Assessment focuses more on their sale by MSBs than banks, but this portion is a generic analysis.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469491 - 01/17/06 01:41 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 82
|
Ken,
Are you saying that you would consider these cards monetary instuments that must be logged for $3,000+ cash purchases? (I haven't been able to find a definitive answer on this anywhere.)
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469492 - 01/17/06 05:52 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
|
Here's a definitive answer, and it's been given here several times before: The sale or recharging of stored value cards does not have to be "logged" for the $3,000 cash sales recordkeeping rule. That rule specifically requires the recordkeeping only for the sales of bank checks or drafts, cashier's checks, money orders and traveler's checks (see 31 CFR 103.29(a)).
Of course, the rule could be amended. If it is, you'll hear about here, on BankersOnline.com.
_________________________
John S. Burnett BankersOnline.com Fighting for Compliance since 1976 Bankers' Threads User #8
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469493 - 01/17/06 06:44 PM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 82
|
So we don't have to look at stored value card sales for 314(a) requests, correct?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#469494 - 01/20/06 11:42 AM
Re: Stored Value Cards
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
The response at #485058 mentioning 314(a) was to a question about gift checks - it was off the topic.
Currently, there are no specific record retention or identification requirements directed at stored value cards. The instructions to 314(a) searches do not mention a need to review sales of stored value cards. However, stored value cards are subject to the same OFAC vagaries as every other product or service you offer; "checking the list" is not specifically required, it's a risk based decision.
Beyond checking the OFAC list, any requirements you impose on the sale of stored value cards would be from an abundance of caution. Voluntarily treating these sales the way you treat monetary instrument sales would make sense. If it's a "reloadable" card or the maximum dollar amount you offer is significant, voluntarily treating it as you treat an "account" for CIP purposes would also make sense.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|