Start by separating section 205.11 from section 205.6 in your mind. If a consumer makes an error claim under 205.11 that involves an unathorized EFT, then section 205.6 kicks in. Otherwise, the two sections have nothing to do with one another.
Your customer basically has until the Twelfth of Never to claim that transactions are unauthorized. Unlike paper transactions covered by the UCC, there is no statute of limitations or one-year time constraint.
What you should do is identify all the allegedly unauthorized transfers. Determine whether they are, in the bank's opinion, unauthorized. Then apply the section 205.6 limits on liability in 205.6. Start with the first unauthorized transfer, go to the statement on which it was reported, and count 60 days from the date the statement was made available to your customer. Any of the unauthorized EFTs occurring on or before that 60th day will be subject to reimbursement. Those occurring after that date are your customer's responsibility.
The $50/$500 limits don't apply at all, because no access device is involved.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8