I consider it part of our due diligence to determine how the company is structured and functions. Quite often that information is best stated in the OA.
Is a resolution any good if the information in it contradicts the OA? For example, if the OA names a Chief Manager and gives that person all the authority for signing documents and the resolution names a managing member, which is correct?
I recently rejected an attorney prepared consent form because they had used an incorrect title for the designated signer and failed to have the members sign the document. I can't and don't assume that just because an attorney prepared it, the form is correct. I verify it. Too often the attorneys prepare useless paper. When called on their errors, they will acknowledge and correct them. But by then, we are calling the customer back in for signatures and causing delays.
_________________________
Just another self-proclaimed expert ...